From Narratives to Monuments: Symbolic Transformation of the Cultural Landscape of the Kaliningrad Region
pdf (Русский)

Keywords

Cultural Landscape Monuments Symbolic Politics Historical Memory Narratives Semiotics of Space Frontier East Prussia Russia Kaliningrad Region

How to Cite

1. Vendina O., Gritsenko A. From Narratives to Monuments: Symbolic Transformation of the Cultural Landscape of the Kaliningrad Region // Journal of Frontier Studies. 2024. № 2 (9). C. 134-171.

Abstract

The article is based on the materials of field research conducted in the Kaliningrad region in 2022–2023. The authors proceed from the idea of this region as a frontier emerged due to redefinition of jurisdiction of the territories of East Prussia after World War II and geopolitical transformations after 1991. Currently, the region is surrounded by EU countries, and this predetermines its perception as a civilizational frontier – a space of comparison between Russian and European ways of life, and intensified the politicization of local historical memory. The aim of the article is to examine the narratives underlying visual transformation of the cultural landscape of the Kaliningrad region since 1945, their relation to the tasks of de-actualization of the region’s past, appropriation of German heritage and its integration into the Russian cultural space. Cultural landscape is defined both as a product and environment of human activity saturated with a variety of artifacts, and as a sign system that forms, preserves, and controls a certain vision of the world. The use of the semiotic paradigm allowed us to consider monuments as its long-term semantic accents. We also took into account the multiplicity of actors influencing the organization and reorganization of the cultural landscape, the variability of the correlation of political forces and opportunities, and the participation in the transformation processes of both power institutions that limit the possibility of alternative perception of reality, and society that resists ideological programming. The evolution of semantic dominants of the cultural landscape we analyzed in the context of shifts in the ideology and attitudes of regional society. We conclude that the compromise tactics of appropriation of the region’s past, developed over time, are based on countering the challenges of the time and solving practical problems, rather than on political attitudes.

https://doi.org/10.46539/jfs.v9i2.571
pdf (Русский)

References

Angermuller, J. (2015). Discourse studies. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.03216-5

Arhipova, A., & Kirzjuk, A. (2020). Opasnye sovetskie veshhi. Gorodskie legendy i strahi v SSSR. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russian).

Assman, A. (2014). Dlinnaja ten' proshlogo: Memorial'naja kul'tura i istoricheskaja politika. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russian).

Assman, A. (2017). Raspalas' svjaz' vremen? Vzlet i padenie temporal'nogo rezhima Moderna. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russian).

Barthes, R. (1970). Semiologie et urbanisme [Semiology and Urban Planning]. L’Architecture d’aujourd’hui, 153, 11-13. (In French).

Barthes, R. (1975). Osnovy semiologii. In E. Ja. Bassin & M. Ja. Poljakov (Ed.), Strukturalizm: «za» i «protiv». Sbornik statej (pp. 114–164). Progress. (In Russian).

Barthes, R. (2001). S/Z (G. K. Kosikov, Ed.). Jeditorial URSS. (In Russian).

Barthes, R. (2007). Nouvelles mythologies [New Mythologies]. Le Seuil. (In French).

Bellentani, F. (2021). The Meanings of the Build Environment. Semiotic and Geographical Approach to Monuments in the Post-Soviet Era. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110617276

Bernhard, M., & Kubik, J. (2014). A Theory of the Politics of Memory. In M. Bernhard & J. Kubik (Eds.), Twenty Years After Communism: The politics of memory and commemoration (pp. 7–34). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199375134.003.0002

Bevernage, B. (2018). Narrating Pasts for Peace? A Critical Analysis of Some Recent Initiatives of Historical Reconciliation through ‘Historical Dialogue’ and ‘Shared History.’ In St. Helgesson & J. Svenungsson (Eds.), Ethos of History. Time and Responsibility (pp. 71–93). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvw04kkp.8

Danto, A. (2002). Analiticheskaja filosofija istorii (L. B. Makeeva, Ed.). Ideja-Press. (In Russian).

Dementev, I. O. (2014). “What Can I Know?”: Formation of Discourses About the Past of the Kaliningrad Region in the Soviet Time: the Late 1940s - 1980s. In Ljudi i teksty. Istoricheskij al'manah. Vypusk 7 (pp. 175–218). Institut vseobshhej istorii RAN. (In Russian).

Dementev, I. O. (2020). Soviet-Era Civic Monuments in the Cultural Landscape of Kaliningrad. Heritage of Centuries, 3, 40–61. (In Russian).

Dementev, I. O. (2023). Politika pamjati v Kaliningradskoj oblasti. In A. I. Miller, O. Ju. Malinova, & D. V. Efremenko (Ed.), Politika pamjati v Rossii – regional'noe izmerenie (pp. 137–175). INION RAN. (In Russian).

Eco, U. (2006). Otsutstvujushhaja struktura. Vvedenie v semiologiju. Symposium. (In Russian).

Epple, N. (2022). Neudobnoe proshloe. Pamjat' o gosudarstvennyh prestuplenijah v Rossii i drugih stranah. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russian).

Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge & the Discourse on Language. Pantheon.

Gavrilina, L. M. (2011). The Kaliningrad Text in the Semiotic Space of Culture. Vestnik Baltijskogo federal'nogo universiteta im. I. Kanta, 6, 75–83. (In Russian).

Gavrilina, L. M. (2013). «Kaliningradskij tekst» kak reprezentacija regional'noj identichnosti. Labirint. Zhurnal social'no-gumanitarnyh issledovanij, 5, 88–99. (In Russian).

Grigor'eva, R. A., & Martynova, M. Ju. (2017). Molodezh' v gorodah Kaliningradskoj oblasti. IJeA RAN. (In Russian).

Jurginis, J. (1969). Amžinoji ugnis ant lietuvninkų kapo [Eternal Fire on the Tomb of the Lithuanians]. In J. Jurginis (Ed.), Istorija ir poezija [History & Poetry] (pp. 301–312). Vaga. (In Lithuanian).

Kostyashov, Yu. V. (2005). «Obratnichestvo» v processe zaselenija Kaliningradskoj oblasti v poslevoennye gody. In V. I. Gal'cev (Ed.), Baltijskij region v istorii Rossii i Evropy (pp. 211–219). Izdatel'stvo RGU im. I. Kanta. (In Russian).

Kostyashov, Yu. V. (2016). Kenigsbergskij kafedral'nyj sobor i mogila Immanuila Kanta v sovetskom Kaliningrade. Kantovskij Sbornik, 35(4), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2016-4-7 (In Russian).

Kostyashov, Yu. V. (2017). Perception and Memorialization of Königsberg's Cultural Past in Contemporary Kaliningrad. Modernizacija kul'tury. Ot cheloveka tradicii k kreativnomu sub’ektu. Materialy V Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, 237–241. (In Russian).

Kostyashov, Yu. V. (2020). Soviet War Memorials in Kaliningrad and the Evolution of Historical Memory (mid-20th - early 21th Centuries). Heritage of Centuries, 3, 62–72. (In Russian).

Kostyashov, Yu. V. (Ed.). (2018). Vostochnaja Prussija glazami sovetskih pereselencev. Kaliningradskaja kniga. (In Russian).

Kostyashov, Yu. V., & Sergeev, V. V. (2018). Regional politics of memory in Poland’s Warmia and Masuria. Baltic Region, 10(4), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2018-4-8 (In Russian).

Laclau, E. (2014). The Rhetorical Foundations of Society. Verso.

Laclau, E., & Mouffe, Ch. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. Verso.

Letnyakov, D. E. (2022). Modes of historical memory: from Hegemonism to agonism. Politics and Society, 1, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0684.2022.1.37499 (In Russian).

Lotman, Yu. M. (1984). Simvolika Peterburga i problemy semiotiki goroda. In Semiotika goroda i gorodskoj kul'tury. Peterburg (pp. 30–45). n. p. (In Russian).

Lotman, Yu. M. (1992). Semiotika prostranstva. In Izbrannye stat'i (Vol. 1, pp. 386–447). Aleksandra. (In Russian).

Lotman, Yu. M. (2000). Semiosfera. Iskusstvo – SPB. (In Russian).

Malinova, O. Ju. (2018). Politika pamjati kak oblast' simvolicheskoj politiki. In A. I. Miller & D. V. Efremenko (Ed.), Metodologicheskie voprosy izuchenija politiki pamjati (pp. 27–54). Nestor-Istorija. (In Russian).

Malinova, O. Ju., & Miller, A. I. (2021). Vvedenie. Simvolicheskaja politika i politika pamjati. In V. V. Lapin & A. I. Miller (Eds.), Simvolicheskie aspekty politiki pamjati v sovremennoj Rossii i Vostochnoj Evrope: Sbornik statej (pp. 7–37). Izdatel'stvo Evropejskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge. (In Russian).

Mankevich, D. V., & Megem, M. E. (2023). International heritage in the memorial landscape of the Kaliningrad region. Baltic Region, 15(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2023-2-8 (In Russian).

Maslov, V. N. (2014). Pereimenovanie rajonnyh centrov Kaliningradskoj oblasti v 1946 g. Vestnik Baltijskogo federal'nogo universiteta im. I. Kanta, 12, 58–69. (In Russian).

Miller, A. I. (2020). Vvedenie. Bol'shie peremeny. Chto novogo v politike pamjati i v ee izuchenii? In A. I. Miller & D. V. Efremenko (Eds.), Politika pamjati v sovremennoj Rossii i stranah Vostochnoj Evropy: Aktory, instituty, narrativy (pp. 8–24). Izdatel'stvo Evropejskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge. (In Russian).

Odesskii, M. P., & Feldman, D. M. (2008). Ideologema “Patriot” In Russian, Soviet And Post-Soviet Culture. Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 1, 109–123. (In Russian).

Pahaljuk, K. (2011). Zahoronenija i pamjatniki Pervoj mirovoj vojny na territorii Kaliningradskoj oblasti. Voennaja arheologija, 6, 52–59. (In Russian).

Ricœur, P. (1998). Vremja i rasskaz: Vol. 1: Intriga i istoricheskij rasskaz. Universitetskaja kniga. (In Russian).

Rodionova, I. V. (2009). Stanovlenie koncepcii sovetskogo patriotizma. Vlast', 4, 152–156. (In Russian).

Rothe, W., & Wiemer, D. (2016). Zur Siedlungsgeschichte von Preussisch-Litthauen am Beispiel der Region des Kirchspiels Tollmingkehmen und Umgebung [On the Settlement History of Prussian-Lithuania using the Example of the Region of the Parish of Tollmingkehmen and Surroundings]. PRUSSIA Gesellschaft. (In Germany).

Safronovas, V. (2014). Vostochnaja Prussija – nedodelennoe nasledstvo? Ab Imperio, 1, 205–243. https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2014.0024 (In Russian).

Shmid, V. (2003). Narratologija. Jazyki slavjanskoj kul'tury. (In Russian).

Stepanov, Ju. S. (Ed.). (2001). Semiotika. Antologija. Delovaja kniga. (In Russian).

Tjupa, V. (2014). Narrative Strategies. In P. Hühn, J. Ch. Meister, J. Pier, & W. Schmid (Eds.), Handbook of Narratology (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 564–574). Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110316469.564

Tjupa, V. I. (2011). Narrativ i drugie registry govorenija. Narratorium, 1–2. http://narratorium.rggu.ru/article.html?id=2027584 (In Russian).

Toporov, V. N. (1983). Prostranstvo i tekst. In Tekst: Semantika i struktura (pp. 227–284). Nauka. (In Russian).

Toporov, V. N. (1984). Peterburg i peterburgskij tekst russkoj literatury. In Semiotika goroda i gorodskoj kul'tury. Peterburg (pp. 4–29). n. p. (In Russian).

Torfing, J. (2005). Discourse theory: Achievements, arguments, and challenges. In D. Howarth & J. Torfing (Eds.), Discourse theory in European politics: Identity, policy and governance (pp. 1–32). Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523364_1

Zenkin, S. N. (2003). Kritika narrativnogo razuma. NLO, 59(1). https://magazines.gorky.media/nlo/2003/1/kritika-narrativnogo-razuma.html (In Russian).

Zenkine, S. (2020). Mythologies, soixante ans apres. Transilvania, 4, 7–11. https://doi.org/10.51391/trva.2021.04.02.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.