The COVID-19 Pandemic as an Existential and Cultural Event: Groups, New Cultural Boundaries, and the Phenomenon of Mood (a Sase Study of the Russian Society)
pdf (Русский)


Culture existence cultural boundaries cultural divides phenomenon of mood COVID-19 pandemic COVID-alarmists COVID-conformists COVID-sceptics COVID-deniers

How to Cite

1. Voronov V. The COVID-19 Pandemic as an Existential and Cultural Event: Groups, New Cultural Boundaries, and the Phenomenon of Mood (a Sase Study of the Russian Society) // Journal of Frontier Studies. 2021. № 1 (6). C. 41-68.


The article examines the emerging cultural divides that we can see in the different reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic. A classification of groups is suggested: COVID-alarmists, COVID-conformists, COVID-sceptics, and COVID-deniers.

The difference between the groups appears to be related to culture and information, revealing different attitudes towards the danger and protection measures. The attitude manifests itself in opinions, modes of behaviour, and political discourses. The experience of the pandemic is analysed in its cultural and existential aspects. The article aims at revealing existential and ontological foundations explaining the difference in opinion between the groups. The author chooses the following as a theoretical and methodological basis: existential and ontological interpretation of the phenomenon of mood (V.V. Bibikhin, M. Heidegger), M. Heidegger’s existential analytics project in general and its interpretations by M. Boss and E. Fink, and L. Wittgenstein’s concept of language game. From an empirical standpoint, the author carries out a secondary analysis of the sociological survey data collected in the KoronaFOM Project by the Public Opinion Foundation (FOM).

The author concludes that the difference between pandemic-related language games is due to the antinomic nature of the modern European mood that continues to determine the modern cultural attitudes. Primarily, it is the antinomy between the fundamental intention of the modern European culture to assert individual free will and the equally fundamental aspiration to establish technological and scientific control over the world. The article may interest both scholars analysing the COVID-19 pandemic from the social and humanitarian standpoint and those interested in studying cultural boundaries, divides, cultural exclusion zones, and social groups.
pdf (Русский)


Agamben, G. (2020). Clarifications. Retrieved from An und für sich website:

Andryukov, B. G., Zaporozhets, T. S. & Besednova, N. N. (2018). Projected strategies of finding new ways to combat infectious diseases. Antibiotics and Chemotherapy, 63(1–2), 44–55. (In Russian).

Bacon, F. (1972). Novum Organum. In F. Bacon, Works in 2 Volumes (Vol. 2, pp. 6–224). Moscow: Mysl. (In Russian).

Badiou, A. (2020, March 23). On the Epidemic Situation. Retrieved from website:

Begun, B., Voloshuk, E., Chertenko, A., & Troitskiy, S. (2014). Strategies of studying zones of cultural exclusion. In Modern studies of Russian society (pp. 79–94). Helsinki: Unigrafia.

Bibikhin, V. V. (2006). Translator’s notes. In M. Heidegger, Being and Time (pp. 448–451). Saint Petersburg: Nauka. (In Russian).

Bibikhin, V. V. (2015). Time (time-genesis). Saint Petersburg: Vladimir Dal. (In Russian).

Bibikhin, V. V. (2017). Другое начало. Saint Petersburg: Nauka. (In Russian).

Borisov, E.(1998). Translator’s note. In M. Heidegger, History of the Concept of Time: Prolegomena (pp. 342–344). Tomsk: Vodoley. (In Russian).

Boss, M. (1994). Martin Heidegger’s influence on establishment of an alternative psychiatry. Logos, (5), 88–100. (In Russian).

Bulgakov, M. A. (1989). A Young Doctor's Notebook. In M. A. Bulgakov, Collected Works in 5 Volumes (Vol. 1, pp. 69–176). Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya Literatura. (In Russian).

Condorcet, J. A. (1936). Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Spirit. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoye sotsialno-ekonomicheskoye izdatelstvo. (In Russian).

Dmitriev, I. S. (2015). “Inquisitor de rerum natura”: sources of F. Bacon’s experimentalist methodology. Matters of History of Natural Science and Technology, 36(3), 433–454. (In Russian).

Fink, E. (2017). The Basic Phenomena of Human Existence. Moscow: Kanon+. (In Russian).

Foucault, M. (1998). The Birth of the Clinic. Moscow: Smysl. (In Russian).

Fukuyama, F. (2004). Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. Moscow: AST, Luks. (In Russian).

Gofman, E. (2017). Behaviour in Public Places. Notes on Social Organisation of Crowds. Moscow: Elementarnye formy. (In Russian).

Golovanova, E. I., & Madzhaeva, S. I. (2020). About the dictionary of the era of the coronavirus pandemic. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University. Philological sciences, (7), 48–57. doi: 10.47475/1994-2796-2020-10707 (In Russian).

Heidegger, M. (1993). European Nihilism. In M. Heidegger, Time and Being: Articles and Speeches (pp. 63–176). Moscow: Respublika. (In Russian).

Heidegger, M. (2006). Being and Time. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian).

Heidegger, M.(2013). The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics. Saint Petersburg: Vladimir Dal. (In Russian).

Kuznertsov, G. (2020). Restitution of power: pandemic, expertocracy, and new political reality. In G. Kuznertsov, Goodbye, COVID? (pp. 193–215). Moscow: Izdatelstvo instituta Gaidara. (In Russian).

Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.

Malinov, A. V. (2016). Research Centre for studying cultural exclusion and boundary areas at the RAS Institute of Sociology. Petersburg Sociology Today, (7), 431–434. (In Russian).

Mikhel, D. V. (2008). Public health and vibrio cholera: Russian Empire, medicine and bacteriology of the early 20th century on the cholera threat. News of Saratov University. 2008. History Series. International Relations, 8(2), 64–75. (In Russian).

Nichols, T. (2019). The Death of Expertise: The Campaign Against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters. Moscow: Eksmo, Bombora. (In Russian).

Nikitskaya, E. (2020, December 23). The mask on the face is the responsibility of everyone. Retrieved from MK.RU website: (In Russian).

Peshperova, I. Yu. (2016). Interdisciplinary studies of cultural exclusion and boundary areas. Thought, (21), 179–183. (In Russian).

Sheipin, S. (2020). COVID and Society. In Goodbye, COVID? (pp. 356–370). Moscow: Izdatel'stvo instituta Gaydara. (In Russian).

Speransky, L. (2020, April 4). Secret entertainment in coronavirus Moscow: hidden fitness and secret parties. Retrieved from МК website: (In Russian).

Tolstoy, L. N. (2006). The Death of Ivan Ilyich. In L. N. Tolstoy, Works in 90 Volumes (Vol. 26, pp. 61–113). Moscow: Russian State Library. (In Russian).

Troitskiy, S. (2018). The problem of terminological precision in studies on cultural exclusion zones. Rivista Di Estetica, (67), 165–180. doi: 10.4000/estetica.2772

Wittgenstein, L. (1994). Philosophical Investigations. In L. Wittgenstein, Philosophical Works Part I (pp. 75–319). Moscow: Gnosis. (In Russian).

Yegorov, A. M., Ulyashova, M. M., & Rubtsova, M. Y. (2018). Bacterial enzymes and resistance to antibiotics. Acta Naturae, 10(4), 33–48. (In Russian).

Zakutina, E. (2020, July 24). “I Don’t Believe It! - A Sociological Portrait of a COVID Denier. Retrieved from KoronaFOM Project website: (In Russian).

Zakutina, E. (2021, February 2). Abandoning the Illusions. Retrieved from KoronaFOM Project website: (In Russian).

Zizek, S. (2020). Pandemic!: COVID-19 shakes the world. New York and London: OR Books.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.